You are not logged in.
The problem with German Dziebel (whom you cite in a link, above) is that what he writes is HYPOTHETICAL. That is, nothing more than his personal speculations. DNA studies exhibit scientific FACTS. And, even if some people from North America migrated to Siberia many, many, many thousands of years ago (as Dziebel believes), and spread some of their DNA around (Q is an extremely small haplogroup in Europe), that doesn't make Europeans American Indians! By now, such Europeans might be 1/10,000 (one / ten-thousandth) Indian; or 1 part Indian and 9,999 parts non-Indian. He also has to explain why there are no mtDNA haplotypes from the Indian female lines in Europe. Of course, some modern American Indians have gone to Europe and fathered or have given birth to children with European spouses. But, this is hardly what he's talking about.
Last edited by sschkaak (Nov-07-2018 01:43:pm)
Confused by different dna clad demarcation yet puts up a response anyway. Ignores all valid discussion.
Quick go edit a wiki page to make you appear right.
Amazing my story is repeated in the news
https://www.chicagotribune.com/lifestyl … story.html
And this is just awesome
https://www.quantamagazine.org/neutral- … -20181108/
You and every person here and elsewhere are absolutely free to believe ANYTHING you like. Maybe, you're right. I don't think so and give my reasons for what I think I know about DNA. Those who want to believe you are free to do so and can speak up anytime they want to. If you want to take offence every time I disagree with you and act like I'm attacking you, personally, there isn't much I can do about that. I've posted enough on this topic. I rest my case.
NeoPaleo wrote: "Quick go edit a wiki page to make you appear right."
First of all, Europedia is not a "wiki page." Second, I am not a member and not capable of editing their content. Unlike some who read here, I'm in the habit of correcting my mistakes--not perpetuating them. That the R Y-DNA haplogroup descends from P, and NOT from Q, is on every haplogroup tree produced by actual specialists in the field of DNA, as opposed to dilettanti, like Forbes and Dziebel, who make wild assumptions based on sketchy information and incomplete knowledge. The R from Q hypothesis falls under the weight of scientific analysis. Should that analysis change, I'll be the first to acknowledge it.
Last edited by sschkaak (Nov-13-2018 06:13:pm)