You are not logged in.
I noticed two entries on LTD for "I have." I think that "nulhatu" refers to an inanimate object, while "nulhala" refers to an animate object? Or does the difference lie in ownership vs. possession? I couldn't quite extrapolate the difference in meaning based on the sentence examples and would appreciate your expertise.
WanÃshi!
Offline
memsuxwet wrote:
I noticed two entries on LTD for "I have." I think that "nulhatu" refers to an inanimate object, while "nulhala" refers to an animate object?
Correct.
Offline
Thanks for clearing that up! I've attempted to conjugate the verbs with my limited understanding of Lenape verb morphology - some conjugations I was able to find on LTD, but not all. Would you mind taking a look?
to have it (inanimate)
nulhatu (1st sing.)
kulhatu (2nd sing.)
ulhatu (3rd sing.)
nulhatuhëna (1st pl.)
kulhatuhëmo (2nd pl.)
ulhatuwak (3rd pl.)
Example: Nulhatuhëna nisha hèmpsa.
to have it (animate)
nulhala
kulhala
ulhala?
nulhalahëna
kulhalawa?
ulhalawak
Example: Hèch kulhala mwekane?
I appreciate any help you can give me here. Wanìshi!
Offline
memsuxwet wrote:
Thanks for clearing that up! I've attempted to conjugate the verbs with my limited understanding of Lenape verb morphology - some conjugations I was able to find on LTD, but not all. Would you mind taking a look?
to have it (inanimate)
nulhatu (1st sing.)
kulhatu (2nd sing.)
ulhatu (3rd sing.) or /wulhatu/
nulhatuhëna (1st pl.)
/kulhatuhena/ - 1st person plural inclusive - add this one
kulhatuhëmo (2nd pl.)
ulhatuwak (3rd pl.) or /wulhatuwak/
Example: Nulhatuhëna nisha hèmpsa.
to have it (animate)
nulhala
kulhala
ulhala? /welahalao/ or /ulhalao/ - requires an obviative ending for two animate 3rd persons in one word
nulhalahëna /nulhalawena/
/kulhalawena/ - 1st person plural inclusive - add this one
kulhalawa
ulhalawak /welahalawoo/ or ulhalaoo/ - requires an obviative ending for two animate 3rd persons in one word
Example: Hèch kulhala mwekane?
I appreciate any help you can give me here. Wanìshi!
Offline